Roadmap to Unicode Conversion
SAP Unicode White Paper
Navigation
Poll
Who's online
Realistically, what is your risk if you defer converting to Unicode?
If you read the Case for Unicode, you realize that you face a risk of data loss or corruption based on numerous warnings if you remain in a non-Unicode SAP environment. So what is your real risk? Click to read more.
Layering of risk
Short of an exhaustive data analysis in your current environment, it would be virtually impossible to quantify the risk. The only way for you to make the call as to your organization's exposure to potential data loss/corruption, is to analyze how many factors that are known risk contributors are present in your landscape, and then developing it into a risk profile.
Risk Components
Review the following risk components as to whether they are present in your landscape, and map it to the illustrative graph. If there is more than one system of the same component group, increment the component count.
- JAVA components (eg. SAP Portal, Mobile Infrastructure etc...). SAP note 975768
- MS-Office Integration (eg. MS Excel updates to SAP, BEX, etc...)
- HTTP/HTML (eg. Portals, CRM etc...)
- SOA - Service Oriented Architecture. SAP note 1358929
- Technology differences (eg. interfaces from mainframes, unix, windows etc...)
- Asian languages
- XI/PI
Non-Unicode Risk Model

The above is not intended to be quantitative, but is provided merely to be used as a guide to assist in providing perspective for your environment.

- Login or register to post comments
- Send to friend

